June 2008 Archives

Sani -- Requiescat in Pace

   . . .

"I suppose I'll have to change the name of the blog."  Anything to avoid thinking about what I've done.

His story begins in Wisconsin.  He and his brother were adopted by my sister-in-law and her family.  They were trouble from the get-go.  They were thought to be female.  They climbed into the ceiling.  They opened the drain-valve on the hot-water heater.  They urinated on some personal items of my brother-in-law's.  Rather than have them be separated at the Humane Society, Nicole & I drove to Green Bay to take them.  They were exactly 6 months old.

Sani & Piper came to live with Tabby and Cairo and Nicole and I.  They were cute, and kittenish, and solemn and got-along pretty-well with the older cats.  I remember the boys (ah, god.  I have no more call for the plural!) chasing a fly; leaping from floor to window ledge to imperious Jordan-like heights, sprinting around the room, panting from effort and frustration.  Tabby dropped from her love-seat observation post, quietly hopped to the far-end of the window ledge, cat-footed across and, undramatically as a routine 3rd-inning 2nd-out fly-ball, deftly plucked the fly from the air.  I've never seen a better, braver, display of "watch and learn, kid."  I remember spending an hour and a roll of film photographing the 4 of them.  I remember watching Sani leap to impossibly narrow ledges filled with knick-knacks, and weave a path between calamity and gravity.  I remember unbelievably soft fur.  I remember finally hearing a purr so quiet that for years we thought he didn't have one.  I remember a good friend who helped my wife cope with the hopeless loss of her beloved Cairo.  A kind fellow who ritually said goodnight, every night, but for months refused to curl up and sleep in what was Cairo's spot.  Until it became his.

In the end, despite years of trying everything, he never stopped spraying.  We tried the alprazolam for weeks.  It helped, initially.  But even before Memorial Day, he was spraying again.  After Memorial Day, and our disruption of his drug regimen, he got worse.  We agreed that if the alprazolam didn't work, we'd have to consider euthanasia.  But, we don't quit easy.  We checked for anything that could be causing him to spray.  Urinalysis showed he had a UTI.  The aspirin he was taking for his heart and the alprazolam blunted his symptoms, so we didn't know about the UTI.  Huzzah!  A reason to hope.  We put him through a course of antibiotics, to cure the UTI.  He got better, and the spraying became less frequent.  But it never stopped.  His behavior became increasingly ungoverned.  He was either a placid, drooling, puddle-of-cat on your lap, or freestyle cat-ranging across the house, yowling in 2-part disharmony with his drugged brother, occasionally attacking Ember or me (but never, ever Tabby -- how do I tell my blind old cat with failing kidneys and little life left that I just killed her snuggle-buddy?).

Finally, we were forced to realize that he wasn't going to stop spraying.  Ever.  We could either let him destroy our house, or kill him.  You'd think that would be an easy decision.  The only good thing about it, was the Vet was able to help us within an hour of our making the decision.

I've read that "requiescat in pace" is Latin for "rest in peace."  It stems from the Roman Catholic, biblical belief that after death a person must wait for the Day of Judgment before learning his fate.  The phrase is a prayer that the dead will wait in peace, rather than in purgatory or torment.  I don't know what happens after death.  I believe it's just the end.  I hope I'm wrong.  I hope my buddy has found some peace, in the absence of pills, of frantic late-night hungers, of heart-disease, of potentially-lethal urethral-blockages so painful as to cause him to urinate blood.  But I doubt there will be much peace for Nicole or I for a while.  To the last, we did the best we could for him.  In the end, I hope that will be enough.

Thumbnail image for MyPicture.jpg

The readiness is all.

Tabby, eldest of the titular cats, has many medical problems.  She is blind, almost completely so.  She's had chronic upper-respiratory problems her entire life.  She has a "galloping heartbeat," possibly indicative of a thickened heart-wall muscle.  She's now 16 years old.  She is in the very early stages of kidney failure.  She has no body fat, weighs a mere 7 lbs, and, should she lose even a little more weight is in serious danger of liver failure.

One aspect of kidney failure is reduced acidity of urine.  This leads to urinary tract infections.  Which lead to dehydration and malaise-induced loss of appetite.  In Tabby's case, that means death.  A further complication is that her heart condition means administering subcutaneous fluids to combat dehydration can be lethal.  Increased fluid-volume increases blood pressure, increasing the likelihood of heart attack, stroke, or embolism.

Saturday, Tabby went to the Vet (not her usual one) because she went to the litterbox 20 times in 20 minutes.  We concluded she had been constipated, but was OK.  Sunday, Tabby had an emergency appointment with her usual Vet (Fowlerville Veterinary Clinic).  Can't say enough good things about them.  We went home with a partially-rehydrated Tabby and some antibiotics to combat the urinary-tract infection I and the other Vet had missed on Saturday.  She continued to refuse to eat.  I believed I'd be euthanizing Tabby on Monday or Tuesday.  Instead, she resumed eating that evening.  She's been doing well since.

Nonetheless, . . .  Tabby is one of the oldest & dearest friends I've made, since moving to Lower Michigan.  She has harrangued me, annoyed me, awakened-me-nightly-at-1AM, insinuated herself between me and the Wife that Tabby considers "the other woman," pissed on my carpets for no apparent reason, and always -- always, she has been my affectionate, devoted companion.  Finally, after 14 years, she's begun to leave me.  That wasn't part of the deal.

Dueling Denial

I've been thinking.  Does it seem to you that climate-change denial & evolution denial share a demographic?  I don't know why it seems that way to me, but it does.  And that's strange, because they're fundamentally incompatible.

Denying the existence of evolution, going back to Alfred Wallace (who, as a "co-discoverer" certainly didn't deny evolution, but did deny that humans evolved), is all about how humans are important.  We are the specially-created, the image of our Creator, the measure of all things.  We are that, without which, the Universe is meaningless, and those unto whom the world was given.  After all, no religion teaches us that God sent his only budded rhizome to the Irises.  It's all about us, baby!

Climate-change denial is all about how humans are . . . not exactly unimportant, but certainly not central.  I mean, come on -- we've only had internal combustion engines for a hundred years or so.  It's not like we've had time enough or tools to change the world!

At root, the one idea is that humans are the most important, powerful thing in the world.  At root, the other idea is that humans are really just a supporting player, capable at most of influencing the world, but certainly not altering it.  And yet, it seems to me that the groups holding these ideas overlap.  I must be wrong.  It's too inconsistent, too illogical on the face of it.  And yet, I can't shake the idea.

I need Danger Glasses!

| 1 Comment
We've resumed shoving a pill down Sani's throat, twice a day.
Positive result: He seems to have stopped spraying again.
Negative result: He's become more aggressive.

Nicole says she witnessed him attacking Ember (who is larger, younger, doesn't have a heart murmur, does all 4 sets of claws), twice.  More personally, he's taken over Tabby's role as The Midnight Waker.  He's now the cat who wakes me, nightly, to feed him and Tabby.  (Tabby had actually started to sleep through the night.  Doubtless a sign of advanced age.)  Unfortunately for me, he's not nearly as polite as Tabby was.  His standard method is to wander around yelling for a few minutes, then leap onto the bed and stomp across my head.
Thumbnail image for Eye-scratch.jpg

Last night, he decided to walk across my face.  I didn't lift him quickly enough.  So yeah -- that's a set of claw marks across my left eye.  No real damage, just scratches.  I probably won't get a cool Spike-like eyebrow scar.  :-(

Justice & Disease

| 1 Comment
Sani's resumed spraying, but mildly.  That is to say, he's not returned to the bad old days when we contemplated euthanasia because he was spraying throughout the house, but he is spraying again.  It may be because we reduced his dosage for a few days.  Not a good idea, but Memorial Day Weekend & his 'script refill overlapped.  We chose to administer at a reduced dosage, over skipping a few days entirely.  His resumption may also be an effect of putting the drug into his food.  Historically, he rejected food that contained amitriptyline.  He doesn't reject alprazolam-laced food, but he isn't wolfing-it-down like he was before the Holiday, either.  In some cases, he doesn't consume all the food/drug.  That alters how the drug affects him.  We'll resume shoving a pill down his throat, and see what effect that produces.  But, bottom-line, I'm back to worrying about whether or not I'll be euthanising a cat.  If he continues to increase the frequency and locations of his spraying, we won't be any better-off for having switched to alprazolam.

This leads me think about other things.  Vets don't really understand what causes Sani's condition.  The closest thing to an explanation I've heard is that his brain possesses an abnormally strong stress-response.  He's constantly stressed by the presence of other cats and India, and the natural response to stress is to re-enforce his perceived security.  He does that by marking territory as "his" -- i.e., spraying.  I can't reassure him.  I can't explain how his behavior actually severely increases his danger, because it leads to me killing him.

I understand that the civilized world, certain North American countries excepted, holds it immoral to punish or execute an insane person.  OK -- but why?  As I understand the argument against punishment, it rests on the willful nature of an offense.  Infants, for example, aren't generally disciplined for "flippin' the bird" at their parents, because 1) they haven't learned that that gesture is offensive, yet; and, 2) they aren't actually gesturing, because they don't have control over their hands, yet.  Punishment, then, is reserved as a negative-reward for behavior that is understood to be offensive, and under the control of the offender.  An insane person, being either uncontrolled, unaware, or both, should then not be punished.

But, an offender actually did harm to someone.  (Yes, I know there are lots of offenses that don't actually harm others.  I'm not thinking about those, here.  I could argue that they shouldn't be considered offenses, but this post is long enough, eh?)  That means the offender has objectively demonstrated a capacity for harm.  Further, the offender is incapable of preventing additional harm.  That leaves two options -- remove the offender from the possibility of committing future offenses, or leave him be and accept any future harm as the cost of not engaging in pointless punishment of an insane person.  Option 1 reduces to execution or imprisonment.  Both of those are generally considered a form of punishment.  So the attempt to avoid punishment results in punishment.  Option 2 fulfills the requirement to avoid punishment, but it leaves everyone else exposed to future offense.  (This is where I am with Sani, right now.  Although I can still hope that the drugs will change his behavior.)

For me, personally, this is where I part company from the civilized world.  I think the magnitude of the possible offense can be sufficient to merit either execution or incarceration.  On the other hand, I also think that the magnitude of the offense can merit turning a blind-eye.  If we're talking about an exhibitionist, then so what?  Let him go; the time, effort, and money spent executing or incarcerating him far outweigh any possible harm he might do.  Back to the first hand, if he's a serial rapist, then he is likely to hurt people again.  In that instance, I think we incarcerate or execute him.  (Yes, I know I picked extreme cases, and that the difficulty lies in the middle.)  Granted, it won't get him to change his behavior.  But we've already concluded he's insane -- he won't change his behavior, regardless.  What I'm doing is the only thing I can do to change his behavior.  The irony here, is that we're avoiding punishing him by engaging in exactly those actions that would otherwise be used to punish him.

Returning to the original context of Sani & spraying, this means I'm nearing the point of irrationality with his condition.  If the drugs don't work, then either I must irrationally execute him, or irrationally allow him to destroy my house.  Is there such a thing as a "Crazy Cat Gentleman?"

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from June 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

May 2008 is the previous archive.

July 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.